-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I noticed that Cisco published this blog entry today: http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/global-internet-routing-table-reaches-512k-milesto... FYI, - - ferg On 8/13/2014 3:21 PM, Adam Kaminski via Outages wrote:
The sup2t-xl for the 6500 series should not affected by this. The 1M TCAM space is shared and not default configured for 512k.
On August 12, 2014 at 6:32:27 PM, Bill Wichers via Outages (outages@outages.org <mailto:outages@outages.org>) wrote:
That's a tcam limit on the 6500/7600 platform. It's not upgradable, but it is configurable.
The gsr platform doesn't have a hard limit like this, its just memory (And is upgradeable), but most with that gear will have already had to upgrade well before now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:14 PM, "Geoffrey Mina via Outages" <outages@outages.org <mailto:outages@outages.org>> wrote:
Cisco gear can't support more than 512K routes... We hit that or close to that at around 4am EDT today.
ISPs are scrambling to update memory in their routers.
-------- Original message -------- From: Michael Peterman via Outages Date:08/12/2014 1:00 PM (GMT-07:00) To: outages@outages.org <mailto:outages@outages.org> Subject: [outages] So what is broken
So is this issue all related to a fiber cut or a DC/Peering point having issues?
http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/liquidweb-among-companies-affected-m...
Michael Peterman
- -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlPr7ZIACgkQKJasdVTchbJhMAEAhN29FzHxGFZ8uxpehiYttF8w 38jN8uiIwsWZ16tMB7EBALf62Ubg5gfi7gUn3A5uv5TTGVO+Ulr5O80+GJFDjDbk =iT32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----