I don't have a problem with discussion because I use a mail client (mutt) that nicely threads discussion. So if I see a reported outage (and subsequent discussion/analysis) that I care about: I read it all. If I see one that that I don't care about: it's trivially easy to ignore. So as long as the "Subject" line is apropos (and is modified if it becomes apparent that the actual outage doesn't fit the orginally chosen subject) then I'd have no problem keeping up with this list even if volume increased many times over. And while the wiki is nice, I think it best to keep outage-related discussions in a text-only forum that can be read and written by people on alternative/slow/low-bandwidth connections -- because they may well be compelled to use those *because* of an outage. ---Rsk