Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:54:04AM -0600, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 2/19/2010 2:45 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
one of my collagues complained about selfhtml.org unreachability, so I checked, and what I found is disturbing:
;; ANSWER SECTION: selfhtml.org. 82408 IN NS ns12.verio.de. selfhtml.org. 82408 IN NS ns13.verio.de.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns12.verio.de. 86259 IN A 213.198.55.91 ns13.verio.de. 86259 IN A 213.198.65.162
Cisco-M-XXX>sh ip b 213.198.55.91 % Network not in table Cisco-M-XXX>sh ip b 213.198.65.192 % Network not in table
Verified at route-views.oregon-ix.net, so it's not a local problem in .DE
Does anybody know more?
I'm a little confused, not that that matters much.
In some places you say "verio.net", in others "verio.de"
I corrected that about two minutes later in a followup e-mail.
Similarly, you are looking, in one place, at "213.198.65.162", another, "213.198.65.192".
Since both addresses are from the same /24, and people don't do longer-than-/24 announcements, it doesn't really make a difference (actually the whole /17 was missing from the BGP system, but came back in the meantime). But indeed, I was not looking closely enough when I wrote that e-mail (the BGP output in question was done after the initial diagnosis to have something to cut-and-paste). Sorry for that. Didn't change the problem, though, and people actually interested in the *issue* have been able to figure out what I was talking about.
I wonder if part of the problem is a general sloppiness in the trouble-shooting.
... but some folks seem to be more interested in pointing out that I make mistakes every now and then. Yes, I'm aware of that. But since the original problem has been solved many hours ago, this is all sort of moot, and we should close the thread or take it off-list. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de