Packet loss between L3 and GBLX
Anyone else noticing continuing packet loss between L3 and GBLX? This has been going on and off for about 18 hours (more?). |----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------| | WinMTR statistics | | Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|- -----|------|------| ... | ae-5-5.ebr2.dallas1.level3.net - 0 | 166 | 166 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 11 | | ae-72-72.csw2.dallas1.level3.net - 0 | 166 | 166 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 11 | | ae-2-70.edge4.dallas3.level3.net - 0 | 166 | 166 | 10 | 14 | 77 | 11 | | gblx-level3-40g.dallas3.level3.net - 0 | 166 | 166 | 10 | 17 | 108 | 36 | | te2-3-10g.ar1.snv2.gblx.net - 12 | 115 | 102 | 55 | 70 | 211 | 67 | | internap.te1-3.ar1.snv2.gblx.net - 19 | 95 | 77 | 56 | 71 | 256 | 81 | ...
2012/5/31 Steve Dispensa <dispensa@phonefactor.com>
Anyone else noticing continuing packet loss between L3 and GBLX? This has been going on and off for about 18 hours (more?).
L3 and GLBX isn't it the same thing ? -- Eduardo Schoedler
The dns names in the traceroute haven't changed (which is what I was referring to), but yeah, the companies have merged. I figured it'd be obvious what I meant from the trace. Sorry if it was confusing. -sd From: Eduardo Schoedler [mailto:listas@esds.com.br] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:45 PM To: Steve Dispensa Cc: outages@outages.org Subject: Re: [outages] Packet loss between L3 and GBLX 2012/5/31 Steve Dispensa <dispensa@phonefactor.com> Anyone else noticing continuing packet loss between L3 and GBLX? This has been going on and off for about 18 hours (more?). L3 and GLBX isn't it the same thing ? -- Eduardo Schoedler
Owner wise, yes Network wise they are still semi-separate I believe (outside the US at least) , I have had recent conversations with people claiming L3 and GLBX as separate units (in the fact they could not deliver a GLBX circuit in an L3-lit building) *From:* outages-bounces@outages.org [mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 31 May 2012 22:45 *To:* Steve Dispensa *Cc:* outages@outages.org *Subject:* Re: [outages] Packet loss between L3 and GBLX 2012/5/31 Steve Dispensa <dispensa@phonefactor.com> Anyone else noticing continuing packet loss between L3 and GBLX? This has been going on and off for about 18 hours (more?). L3 and GLBX isn't it the same thing ? -- Eduardo Schoedler
Using both networks that is certainly our view from a European perspective. I believe only 1st line, provisioning and sales have integrated. Understandably it's a big job trying to integrate and am lead to believe not only will be a slow process but some network elements might never get there in any reasonable time span. Michael On 31 May 2012, at 22:55, "Mike Simkins" <mike.simkins@sungard.com<mailto:mike.simkins@sungard.com>> wrote: Owner wise, yes Network wise they are still semi-separate I believe (outside the US at least) , I have had recent conversations with people claiming L3 and GLBX as separate units (in the fact they could not deliver a GLBX circuit in an L3-lit building) From: outages-bounces@outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org> [mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org>] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 31 May 2012 22:45 To: Steve Dispensa Cc: outages@outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org> Subject: Re: [outages] Packet loss between L3 and GBLX 2012/5/31 Steve Dispensa <dispensa@phonefactor.com<mailto:dispensa@phonefactor.com>> Anyone else noticing continuing packet loss between L3 and GBLX? This has been going on and off for about 18 hours (more?). L3 and GLBX isn't it the same thing ? -- Eduardo Schoedler _______________________________________________ Outages mailing list Outages@outages.org<mailto:Outages@outages.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
participants (4)
-
Eduardo Schoedler -
michael.vanrensburg＠telecity.com -
Mike Simkins -
Steve Dispensa